November
26, 2003
©
2003: JAN COX
Another Intercranium
Dialogue
_______________________________________________
On
a slightly chilled, invigorating morning, a father and son retired with
coffee
to
their back porch with its high view over the fields and distant mountains,
and
after sitting and sipping a while in silence, the elder said:
“Here’s
something I’ve never mentioned:
the
whole world talks incessantly about their concern about whether they are:
doing-the-right-things
in life
(which
amounts to: are they treating their fellow man properly),
and
men’s religious, political and academic organizations are continually promoting
rules and guidelines for acceptable human behavior,
and
many of their most bought books are on the same subject,
and
at the very base of it all is every ordinary man’s individual profession
of doubt
as
to what is precisely the right way to treat other people.
Men
voluntarily take themselves to venues wherein they will pay to be
hectored
and lectured regarding their proclaimed constant failure to
treat their family, friends, lovers, business associates, and even strangers
in
a manner befitting a civilized homo sapien;
no
normal person ever questions the need for such,
and
moreover: no one finds the situation curious.”
A bracing breeze suddenly cut through the area causing them both a grinning shiver, and the elder continued.
“Here’s
the point for the few like us (from as always: our obscure perspective
--
which
is irrelevant to the lives of the rest of humanity): it’s ridiculous!
(or
for the moment let's be figuratively dramatic and say):
‘The
whole thing is unbelievable! What planet are these people from?
Has
all of humanity gone mad? --- or perhaps contracted terminal stupidity?’
I
tell you (the only other human I know to be wired with the potential of
hearing it)
that
there is an absolutely clear, totally unambiguous way to treat and speak
to
other
people --
so
what’s all this endless folderol about having: ‘deep, inner uncertainties’
thereabout; and needing to be taught same by some other human?
Of
course still (as always be the case in affairs special to us):
you
are either born with the conscious understanding of the quite simple,
correct
way to speak to and physically treat other people or you are apparently
not:
in
this realization there are no doubts, no gray areas,
no
situations open to multiple possibilities.
People
like us -- (what to call them? --
they
have no name, which is why I continually make up one for our discussions
[the
rebel, the certain man, the non partisan thinker, and so on]),
but
based on other people’s own, historically consistent admission of not knowing
clearly how to behave toward their fellow man under all circumstances,
people
like us must be distinguished from the rest -- for we know
--
with
no doubts, no reservations, no exceptions.
But
here is another instance wherein I cannot resist noting to you once again
the
possibility that it may not just be us who know the particular thing under
discussion, but that every human being may know it also;
indeed
in all of these cases, from one view it would be reasonable to say that
everyone must
know it -- how can they not
know it? -- they are humans just like us,
and
all of the laws, rules and commandments they collectively come up with
are
nothing less than clear reflections of this knowledge.
Again
as always, can be seen an arrangement:
it
is as though everyone is born with the same knowledge and awareness that
is our family line’s distinguishing trait, but that for some reason they
cannot directly act on it, (directly
being the key word in this expedient scene I am verbally constructing for
you), for all of man’s morality, religion and ethics are in-direct
acknowledgments of them possessing this knowledge;
almost
like knowing how to swim, but denying that you do and insisting throughout
life on your need to be instructed in same.”
The
sun began to show over the far mountain tops as they refreshed their cups,
after
which the father spoke again.
“Consider
the deep curiousness of it:
from
one view you could say that civilization itself is based upon men being
able to be taught to overcome their animalistic, survival based, but socially
disruptive drives (such as taking food and sex whenever you feel so moved,
regardless
of the extant circumstances), and from this perspective
it
is not unfounded to say that civilized men live an unnatural life:
they
cannot take another man’s food or mate or property just because they want
it, (which is the natural reaction of all sentient creatures of this planet),
but
rather they must let collectively established rules determine their conduct,
(which
includes their speech) -- so: starting from there it would
appear expected
and
appropriate that men must be taught behavior that is not natural to them:
that
they must be infused with an artificial, extrinsically-conceived set of
rules
by
which to live and judge the propriety of their lives:
and
it all seems and sounds well (which obviously it is for humanity collectively),
but
I privately say to you that all of it is ridiculous, and simply not true
-- not for us.
Considering
the matter a bit closer up would compel us to say that there is by instinct
something in man that is not present in any other animal:
the
inchoate features man uses to define, ‘being
civilized’ –
so
-- even though it seems to ordinary men that they must be taught,
and
led to behave in the unnatural manner they call: ‘being
civilized’ --
there
is and must be in him, an innate drive to be so (to reuse the allegory:
like
apparently all children can swim -- they simply must be put
into
the
appropriate environment and given the needed encouragement).
So
there is naturally in man the urge to treat (both physically and verbally)
his
fellow creatures in a certain manner -- his idealized: civilized,
caring
and compassionate manner,
and
he then proceeds to spend much of his life energy in discussing, contemplating,
and seeking instruction in the matter.
A
realized man doesn’t need anyone to tell him how to treat and speak to
other people;
the
entire notion is far beyond even ludicrous -- it is insane
--
like
a man insisting that he is not absolutely certain where the ground is.”
The
father set down his cup, stood and stretched, then added.
“And
as always: everything I just said is of most practical use vis a vis
not
you and other people -- but you-and-you
in your own brain.”
“You mean: me and you.”
“Let’s
go for a run.”
J
Non
Urban Wisdom: A man who don't raise himself don't get
raised.
JAN'S
DAILY
FRESH
NEWS
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
homepage
email