A
pond, in and around which was naturally much activity,
originally
thought the dragonfly its neatest visitor,
impressed
by how it stayed constantly in motion,
lighting
for but an instant -- then off again;
but
eventually the pond decided the frog was king:
calm
and immoveable -- just sitting and glaring.*
Acts
deemed laudable amongst the ordinary are always ones of action,
while
in the life of the certain man it is what is not done that is heroic.
All
men take the actions necessary to stay alive,
and
within this province qualitative judgments of action are absurd
in
that any normal man will take whatever actions are required to survive,
but
little of men’s lives now are directly taken up with such demands,
and
thus the majority of his acts are elective;
essentially
irrelevant activities which the individual finds attractive;
men
not fighting for food
(the victor in
such a struggle receiving no reward or recognition beyond that of a full
belly)
may
be found engaging in combat over ideas and principles,
and
it is in this setting wherein the ostensible conqueror is praised for the
valor of
his
actions -- his non essential, irrelevant actions.
Unquestionably
innate in homo sapien’s genes is the neural potential for the brain to
proclaim a wide variety of immanently immaterial actions as estimable;
the
human mind has an intrinsic favorable reaction to tales of men giving their
lives for a religious or political ideal even should that mind be atheistic,
or
hold a contrary partisan position.
On
more intimate levels: men insist on their admiration for those who will
unfailingly, “Tell-the-truth -- no matter who it hurts” –
thereby
covering the full range of human activities:
certain
physical acts men make are honored, as are particular words they may say;
this
is the pedestrian praise pageant as played out both in the public arena,
and
the privacy of each man’s thoughts.
The
man who realizes what is going on in life has a different definition of
what
constitutes exemplary action --
which
is always the lack of taking some particular action, or saying a certain
thing,
and
not just overtly involving others, but primarily in the privacy of his
own head.
Men’s
non essential thoughts and feelings have a need to be constantly spun by
the
expressed thoughts and feelings of other men;
this
facet of man’s life cannot survive without the continual input from outside,
intangible sources;
what
other men say they think and feel about a listener acts on his diversionary
thoughts and emotions as the slap of a passing hand on a tibetian prayer
wheel;
When
he first starts to secretly visit the pond,
the
certain man, by virtue the normal course of the mind,
believes
there is much to be done if he is to ever understand the nature of this
all
important watering hole, and the common forest that surrounds it,
and
those with the solidly wired, anomalous neural wiring
for
long, and vigorously struggle to take such actions, think such thoughts,
ponder
such human emotions and actions,
so
as to collect all of the information necessary for the whole affair to
finally
explain itself and make satisfying sense.
This
is inevitable and inescapable -- initially;
do,
do, do, while always searching books, and other men’s tongues and faces
for further hints of what you should be doing to achieve the goal;
“A
man of no action will never get any where!"
You
cannot simply sit and expect extraordinary understanding to come find you:
you
must be in constant motion:
originally
going here-&-there physically -- later, doing so
mentally.
To
ever see, a man must go through all of this,
but
he can also get into all of this -- never get out --
and never go further;
But
out of this stage,
a
man recognizes that the acts which he knows to be creditable and profitable
for him
are
the actions never taken.
J
for long, and vigorously *Might this be pertinent to the paucity of amphibian pastry chefs?
If
it is difficult to understand -- it is not understanding.
Ordinary
men strain their brains to comprehend,
while
the certain man sits idly by the pond.
JAN'S DAILY REAL NEWS