* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Thousands
of years ago the mind of man conceived of a question
which
fascinates him to this day:
“Do we have free will?”
--
and
there is an interesting feature thereto that is entirely overlooked
(to wit):
men only apply the query to their behavior -- never their thinking;
they
will reflect on and debate interminably the question:
Never
do men pursue this inquiry: not philosophers, not psychologists,
not
neurologists, not sociologists, not theologians,
not
even mathematicians and movie critics.
Wars
have been fought; thrones brought down; religions ruptured,
marriages
destroyed, families fractured and friendships ruined over the question
of free-will regarding men’s behavior:
“Did
so-&-so do what he did because that was what he chose to do?
-- or
was
he subject to unseen psychological, social, economic forces
that
determined his actions in spite of his personal intentions?”
This
question under various guises and sobriquets is argued daily
(often in life
& death circumstances) in man’s judicial courts, and
those of public opinion,
but
the same query is never tendered nor touched by routine minds concerning
Extensive,
persuasive arguments are continually offered on the apparent
both
sides of this question;
given
a moment, an agile mind can present wordy propositions that for the instant
would seem to confidently show that men are free to do what they want &
chose to do,
while
just as smartly can another deft intellect, even using the same basic scenario,
conceive of additional, previously unaccounted for conditions which would
make the man involved incapable of personally selecting a course of action,
but
rather, via the circumstances, forced
him to behave as he did;
but
no ordinary mind ever moves this question into the area which men,
if
they were considering the situation in a different context,
unhesitatingly
insist underpins all of their behavior -- their thinking
(not un akin
to someone trying to understand why an engine is running roughly and never
considering the fuel being used,
while this same
person, when not involved with this specific effort,
continually mentions
to others the importance of fuel quality in the operation of engines).
It
is not even initially a matter of whether thinking is actually related
to behavior or not -- normal minds believe
that it is;
the
mind says that thinking is at the root of behavior --
Judicially,
morally, economically and personally, do men find the question of whether
they and others act freely or under duress (seen or otherwise)
of extreme importance,
but
the certain man sees that matter as suitable to children,
and
only he applies the free will question where it has actual significance,
and
potential to produce results -- to
his own thinking.
When
a man first undertakes to pursue this question down this road
Pondering
whether a thief freely chose to commit his nefarious act due to
laziness & greed, or because of irresistible social, or psychological
forces is one thing,
but
trying to think about whether what you are thinking about right this moment
is what you
decided to think about, or else were somehow made to,
is
an activity not fit for most of six billion minds out of Earth’s six billion;
The
potential purpose-in-it for the certain man cannot be easily
told
(so what else
shocking is to be today revealed?!), but purpose it has in
abundance
for
those who would see what is really going on in life,
for
applying the question of free-will to a person’s own thinking is
the best way possible to exert the kind of pressure needed to finally pop
the bubble of illusion regarding thought which naturally surrounds thought.
You
can discuss, debate, theorize and speculate on the nature of a flashlight
for
eternity, and all the while think it to be whatever you think it
to be,
but
nothing can match actually seeing one for yourself,
and
the only way this is possible is for the flashlight to shine on itself
The
realization which answers all questions
and
explains everything a human can understand about life
is
not the realization of some fact, truth or secret –
it
is the realization of why the only minds who can answer the question:
Those
who know -- do not know,
and
those-who-know
-- know why:
that’s
the realization,
and that’s why no one much is interested in it --
and
why those who originally are,
usually
give up.
J
JAN'S DAILY REAL NEWS