* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Why
the two world wide enjoinders: "Don’t lie,” and “Don’t stare”?
Because:
you
must think about what you are going to say to lie,
and
staring at a speaker indicates you are thinking about what you are hearing.
Under
normal conditions, humans do not think about what they are going to say
before
they say it;
if
you try to, you realize you do not know what you are going to say next;
that
is demonstratively how it is intended to be,
and
humans are obviously not supposed to take notice thereof,
witness
the injunction against lying,
because
that is the one unavoidable-to-notice instance wherein a human
must
think about what they are about to say.
Ordinary
people ordinarily never take notice of this easily verifiable fact;
those
exceptional few who have historically adopted the verbal goal of
seeking
to awaken-from-man’s-dream, or, achieve-enlightenment do
notice it,
though
not necessarily as directly as instantly put,
and
have attempted to alter the situation in themselves through a variety of
methods, whose actual purpose they have always seemed to but comprehend
vaguely.
All
of the disciplines the few pursue devoted to changing a person’s consciousness,
and thus, fundamental understanding of everything,
teach
the need to constantly remember some something-or-the-other;
a
word; a symbol; one’s breath; one’s own existence --
which
all entail an unspecified resistance to man’s normal state of
not
thinking
about how the process he accepts as, him-thinking --
proceeds.
Since,
(as you can instantly prove to yourself -- if you care to),
you
never think about what you are going to say,
then
even more surely, (as you should expect to have noted),
you
do not think about what you will think next;
thinking
just happens in man; automatically and impersonally,
and
that is TheBigSecret
the few unwittingly seek, and almost never face.
What
a person who is trying to live their life while constantly holding in their
mind
some
word, image or sound should eventually learn from the effort is the above;
the
only pragmatic potential to all such exercises is to finally bring a participant
face
to face with the undeniable fact that this non stop, unenlightened thinking
with
which he must continually contend -- is not his,
and
is not something over which any human has any control,
and
the only real purpose of trying to always remember some particular thing
is
to show you that in essence, it is not possible,
which,
when you grasp the living reality of this for yourself,
also
makes you aware of something much larger which does no good to speak of.
But
realizing this for yourself is an astounding moment;
it
is easy to describe it, and easy for your thinking to immediately say that
it understands what is being said, but seeing it for yourself,
(which
is truly discovering for yourself, even if you have already been told about
it),
is the only thing of consequence.
Life
clearly does not want men engaged in what they call, lying
because
each instance requires that an otherwise ordinary human – stop --
unnaturally
interrupt the normal flow of that totally mechanical activity they call
talking, and make the effort to actually think about and plan what they
are going to say.
Unnatural! Unlawful! Impermissible!
Unthinkable!
There
is no metaphysical morality involved in lying, merely men, while doing
so,
running
the risk of realizing what is going on in life.
Staring
is the forbidden counterpart to this,
not
vacant, dead staring, but staring that is alive and analytic.
Glazed-over-eyes
staring;
looking-at-nothing
staring;
lost-in-your-own-dreams
staring is totally acceptable,
but
the enjoinder, “Do not stare at people” means do not consciously look at,
and
listen to them, and actually think
about what you are witnessing:
this
is the same type of no-no as lying,
wherein
you look at and think about what you are going to say before you say,
and
in active, eye/I-alive
staring,
you
are turning the same light onto what someone else is saying.
You
are not supposed to actively listen to and purposefully think about
what
other humans say and the process by which it becomes said --
not
in any manner that would not automatically occur in you
were
you not engaged in a consciously decided, non automatic attempt to do so.
A
human is not supposed to think about what he is going to say next,
least
he notice that he never has any idea what he will,
and
he is not supposed to actively stare at other human beings when they speak
least
he become aware that the speaker does not know what he is going to say
next, and is in no wise responsible for what he is saying, (unless of course
he is lying,
which
would be the only exception to being an uncontrollable fount of
unintended
folderol),
plus
the active, analytical staring at another as they speak
always
causes them a discomfort,
(the
basis of which surely you can by now surmise).
If a man understood it aright, a perfectly fine method to tackle the problem of changing one's consciousness and achieving an extraordinary understanding would be:
J