TWO TOTALLY UNRELATED STORIES
Although
not talked about in these terms outside Philosophy classes,
the
problem of free-will consumes more of man’s attention than anything
other than food.
All
religions, all judicial, political and economic systems
teeter
on the needle’s point of the problem,
balanced
between trying to explain it away and attempting to pave it over.
Were
not men’s brains programmed to conceive of the problem of free-will,
they
would have never been able to fashion the collective concept of civilization
itself, and the unique significance of the individual.
Without
the all pervasive, though indirectly stated question of whether
man
is free to do what he wants or is not,
life
as man knows it now would not exist.
From
his most exalted parliamentary debates,
to
his lowliest personal conversations and private thoughts,
the
tacit question of whether man is capable of freely choosing his actions
and words is always present;
a
silent, subtly ominous shadow that falls everywhere on his universe;
the
supreme, Unanswered Question
-- indeed the one men shun,
and
refuse to even address,
(outside
the meaningless confines of theoretic intellectualism).
Even
though the problem permeates every pore of their existence,
men
do not want
to know if they have free-will or not.
Each
man wields an ad hoc determining knife whereby,
as
the instant conditions call for, he mentally grants or withholds the ability
to
exercise
free choice to himself and/or others;
the
most common exercise thereof being that in an intercourse:
he
had no choice but to do as he did,
while
the other party did have freedom and took their unfortunate action willfully.
This
is the first and final chapters of all ordinary men’s life diaries,
but
this Daily
News is
for readers keeping another non public journal, whose interest
is
not in their required tango de terminare relationship with other
human beings,
but
rather in their own-with-their-self,
which
more technically accurate should be described as their:
wanting
to know what the hell this thing in their head that seems to be their self
is,
AND:
how the
fuck it can have a relationship with itself.
Trees
don’t have a “relationship” with themselves -- they’re just
trees!
That’s
it; they are what they are, and how can a thing have a relationship to
itself --
--
it IS
itself, for chissake!
(Whew!
we must be understanding of such outbursts as some of our readers can get
a bit worked up over all of this.)
The
entire ancient notion that man is born to one state of mind or consciousness,
but
that through certain efforts can bring on a better one
is
based squarely on -- but never saidedly on -- the
problem of free-will;
if
man can be in a superior state of consciousness -- and is
free –
then
why is he not in such a state?
And
once you learn of methods that promise obtainment of the state – if
you are free -- why do you not relentlessly execute them?
If
you are aware of things that keep you in your present state -- and
you are free -- why do you not refrain from or avoid them?
If
you are a pretentious fool -- and you have been given the freedom
to
realize
you are a fool -- why don’t you stop being a fool?
Thought
lives in a glass roundhouse;
only
the most childish, rudimental minds perceive otherwise,
(read
six billion normal minds);
thought
is oblivious to the geometry of its residence,
and
its invisible form of containment leaves thought unaware of its captivity.
Being
round, (and in no small part, assisted by its pathetic memory –
--
about ITSELF),
thought
is never confronted with mental dead ends, brick walls or cul de sacs;
forget
that speed freaked bunny -- thought is the thing that just keeps:
going
-- and going -- and going -- and going.
This
is how normal human consciousness is able to live with the
unbearable
question of whether man has free-will or not;
even
if you try to answer the question -- you cannot --
or:
you
can try & apparently come to a sudden, expedient conclusion that
personally
satisfies you -- for the moment ---
BUT:
were
you free to come to that conclusion, OR:
was
your destiny already so arranged that --
blah, blah, blah.
Not
knowing if you are free or not -- not wanting
to know,
and
not realizing your thoughts live in a glass roundhouse –
these
make up the one routine activity in man’s brain of which he is conscious,
(“But Sir, what ‘he’ is there in a man’s brain other than his consciousness
of
him having a he?!”
“Somebody
give this kid some more gruel and shut him up!”)
A
few people are born with a brain in which the glass roundhouse that
hosts
ordinary men’s minds has a door,
and
the surest way to locate it is by jumping full throttle directly at the
throat of the idea that exists only in your brain: Am
I free -- in
here -- or not?
It
is a nasty, frustrating tussle, one with absolutely no information of any
sort
from
any quarter of any help;
not
one person in this entire universe can help you one little bit in
wrestling
this private, neural virus into liberating submission:
it
is strictly a job for the lone ranger -- not the one with a sidekick
-- the LONE
ranger;
indeed,
the pickle in this instance,
the
milk bottle nailed to the table in the carnival game of the mind,
is
the fact that fighting barehanded with the free-will question
makes
you into a sole practitioner -- a true lone
ranger,
for
no duo -- no partnership can ever
be free,
for
the simple reason that no two people can ever agree all of the time
on
what they should do;
only
he who has no partner, no shadow, no second guesser --
can be free,
(or
in the alternative: can understand the problem of
free-will,
........which
constructively is the same thing...........or perhaps, the best thing available).
*
MORE REGARDING: THE TRIP
Everyone
is a car;
everyone
is on a trip;
the
trip lasts your lifetime.
In
your car are two occupants: a driver and a passenger;
the
driver does nothing but drive and never speaks;
the
passenger talks constantly and seems to have a map
which
he recurringly consults and comments on.
Non
stop, the passenger talks about the trip and himself;
the
great majority of the former, the driver ignores,
but
periodically he will employ one of his suggestions;
the
remainder of the passenger’s monologue is concerned with him
explaining
incessantly, the kind-of-guy he is.
For
the entire trip, the driver never says a word:
not
one word about the trip –
not
a single utterance about himself,
but
he is the one who drives the car & gets them both to their destination.
Everyone is a car;
All
twos live in glass roundhouses;
all
twos sleep;
only
the lone ranger’s eyes are open.
J
.......Et
dona ferentes timeo goobers
Three
times a week Jan speaks in greater detail on the matters about which he
writes
which
you can hear on the net via subscription.