* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In
routine people, thoughts must take themselves seriously;
under
ordinary conditions, thoughts have no choice --
they
are supposed to take themselves seriously.
What
thoughts do when engaged in their primary work of aiding in man’s survival
is
serious --
but most of their energy is not so spent;
and
what they do the rest of the time cannot by any objective definition be
considered serious;
but
routine thoughts are not capable of an objective scrutiny of themselves,
and
thus do, un analytically accept all of their thoughts as serious in spite
of the ever present evidence to the contrary,
(Keep in sight the fact that herein thoughts’ problem solving efforts in
aid of man’s survival,
which are always focused on something outside of man’s mind, are not what
is being reported on,
but rather those thoughts his mind has about matters that exist only in
his thoughts,
and are not literally essential.)
When
men’s thoughts are on something such as a movie, which is clearly entertainment
and not necessary for survival, mind will still take its thoughts about
the movie seriously; film critics are afforded serious stature;
degrees
in film study are awarded; men fall into film related fisticuffs due to
the seriousness with which they take their thoughts thereabout,
(holding
equally so with such subjects as politics, art, religion, morality,
music, history, economics, fashion, psychology and even --
truth & reality.)
Everyone
knows that a man with strong thoughts/views on a particular subject,
no
matter how far afield they may be from the prevailing norm,
will
not have same changed by being told that his thoughts are ridiculous,
no,
regardless of how they may appear to those outside of him,
the
man is constructed such that the thoughts he has he will always take seriously.
What
is not as equally realized (or faced) is that while every man is able to
identify
what he sees as patent foolishness in the thoughts of others,
he
cannot in himself;
it
is not a moral weakness; it is not stupidity, nor bull headed vanity –
it
is the way thought producing consciousness is wired and programmed
in
ordinary men’s brains.
Your
ordinary thoughts can readily deny, argue or ignore this,
but
a brief objective look at the matter by any man capable of such
clearly
shows the validity and species wide commonality of what is being noted.
Idiots
and imbeciles take their thoughts seriously
as
do presidents and prelates --
what choice have they? --
none,
not
if you are to-the-collective-mind-born.
Absolutely
and demonstratively contrary to accepted wisdom,
under
routine conditions men cannot --change-their-minds,
(that is),
simply
put their mental hands on a particular thought common to them,
and
extract it from their mind and fill the now empty spot with a new thought.
Ordinary
people certainly talk under an illusion that says they can do exactly
that, (though by necessity of reality, not speak of it in any detail),
but
a man with exceptional inner-sight-born
can instantly see otherwise,
when
the matter is pointed out to him, as the instant herein .
Under
ordinary conditions people with ordinary minds cannot come to an individual
conclusion & understanding that some particular thought they have is
foolish,
and
should never have been taken seriously to begin with,
and
then remove it from their consciousness, either leaving a blank space there,
or
replacing it with a related thought that is
truly serious.
If
asked directly if they can do this, quite rational men will answer in the
confident affirmative, but it would take a sharp, self-hired, private neural
investigator
all
of fifteen minutes to blow that canard of a case wide open.
If
you really want to see what is going on in life you must first see that
what
goes on in your thoughts is not to be taken seriously;
does
not matter what --
if a thought is not about getting food,
rest
or shelter --
then it is not serious;
your
old, natural born mind and everyone around you may say that it is;
they
may even say that the thought is more serious than those related to survival,
(fidelity to a principle being more important than life itself, for instance,
[a
principle being nothing but a thought about some non essential matter]),
and
neither your original mind nor anyone else’s can ever be made to see this
matter differently.
It
is normal and necessary that ordinary people take all of their thoughts
seriously; did they not, everything you see around you now that was not
on this planet before man appeared would not be here;
Even
though it observably is how the universe wants things to be
in
the life of collective humanity,
from
an outsider’s strictly specialized view,
civilization
could be said to be built on silliness --
not on seriousness, but on outright, unconcealed silliness.
From
this in-the-secret-pocket-perspective,
every
cultural activity ever devised by man is a world wide pretending that
Only
the clear headed, wide eyed secret sleuth can see this objectively;
if
even just reading about it here brings on in your mind,
overwhelming
critical thought about the matter,
then
you are made as silly as the silliness your laughs are condemning.
True,
pure silliness, when seen by a true pure consciousness, calls for no criticism;
only
that which is serious (thoughts about survival matters) is worthy of any
critical consideration (“Is the
way I am pursuing this essential activity the most efficient?”),
but
what conceivable censure is called for regarding thoughts about silly matters?
(“Should I be making my sacrifices
to the gods in the morning or afternoon?”)
From
the double dipped, silk slipped, seeker-of-the-bottom-of-things
view,
every
thought the human mind has about things which have no existence
outside
the human mind are frivolous and totally not to be taken seriously
by
the seeker of inordinate sight;
once
you undertake your investigation from this ad hoc approach,
you
will pretty quickly either see it is so --
or you will not.
There
is no doubt whatever that near a hundred per cent of people
do
not have a consciousness capable of ever realizing this
(along
with what was reported on here yesterday);
the
thoughts inherent and natural to ordinary men simply do not have
the
built in ability to distinguish between essential & serious thoughts,
and
the ones, superfluous & silly, (not under anything less than
life
threatening situations --
at which times all non essential thoughts automatically stop anyway, so
the problem therein never arises).
But
a lone man --
here & there --
from time to time --
is
born with a brain which has the potential to, (so to speak),
artificially
create its own neural, life-threatening
situations --in
itself,
and
by so doing, make all of the silly thoughts that populate his
and
everyone’s original mind, stand off by themselves;
through
conjuring up in his own consciousness, a mental do-or-die circumstance,
he
is able to segregate the silly from the useful.
What
would a clear headed man who understands what is going on be serious about,
other than the few simple matters necessary to stay alive?
Six
billion sane, intelligent and insightful (by their own mass definition)
voices
will
object and say that the life of a reflective, and fully civilized man
is
filled with many other things, (thought things), nearly, if not equally
as important as those necessary for mere physical survival --
........and
for them --
that view is correct;
for the majority --
the silly of thought must be taken seriously;
for the few --
get a grip! --
get serious!
J
P.S.
what greater example of silly thoughts being taken seriously than when
a man says, “I”
-- as in: “ I
think so & so,” or: "I
believe this or that."