JAN’S FRESH REAL
NEWS
© 2001:
Jan
Cox
*********************************************
September 20, 2001.
Thursday --
and time, as measured by mortal minds,
moves on as usual, and in that
certain location,
a father speaks to a son:
“Throughout the world are stories
of resurrection;
from primitive villages to sophisticated
cities,
all tribes, cultures, religions
and nations have a central story of
a hero who was once dead, and
then resurrected himself;
with religions, he is a spiritual
hero,
with nations, a political one,
but in any enduring, cohesive
group -- the resurrected hero is there.
Why? Surely people do not
really believe that
a man who was physically dead,
literally returned to life
when there is nothing in all
of human experience to support such a notion;
so what is actually going on
with the resurrection stories?
You might propose that they arise
from men’s fear of death,
and represent his hope that
it is not as final as it appears,
but there are things present
in man’s everyday life,
(such as loss of wealth, or
of social standing),
that frighten him more than
the loss of his life,
and many other passions, (such
as anger and love),
that overwhelm his fear of death,
so there is something else:
what?
Every group, be they labeled
spiritual, cultural, or political,
has a mythology of a founder,
a hero who endured the ills
common to all men,
and under conditions of defending
new ideas he proposed -- was slain , but after a short passage
of time -- returned to life,
thus becoming living proof of
the potency of his ideas,
which now define the particular
group centered round his story.
But why are such tales necessary?
What do they provide that each
man does not already possess,
in that the stories themselves
flow from mortal mouths?
Resurrection is a story played
out endlessly by all of life,
for all that lives --
by eating that which does no longer --
continues the life of the still
--
resurrects it within its own
flesh,
but no myths are here required,
for this ceaseless cycle of
life, death & resurrection
goes on automatically in the
lives of all groups from grubs to man.
Your constantly dying cells
need no reassuring tales of an afterlife,
nor your gross physique any
regarding the departing cells’ replacement.
Life
knows that life goes on,
as
does the unspeaking part of life within man;
it
is the vocal, conscious part of man’s brain that here stumbles,
(and
that is a specious, un provable statement,
but
expedient for our present purposes, and as always the case:
some
statement is necessary to even operate under
verbal
conditions, but still, compared to the quiet, seamless working of man’s
non conscious operations,
to
say that here, his consciousness, “stumbles” is not without merit).
The stomach asks for no reassurance
that it will tomorrow be fed,
and thus live another day,
as neither does your body in
toto when you lie down for sleep at night, beg to be told of its next
morning resurrection to a state of wakefulness;
only one part of man is involved
in the resurrection stories;
the feature that makes man man:
the-monarch-of-physical-reality,
the intangible, second guards
who protect the king.
The first guards, those instinctively
programmed to instantly respond -- -- without thinking
-- to threats to the king,
have no need-for, nor any interest-in
reassuring stories of resurrection; as with any real samurai, they do their
duty unhesitatingly;
unflinchingly do they defend
their liege, and indeed,
death in doing so is not feared,
but taken as proof of their fidelity.
No, my son, it is only the second
guards,
those responsible for noting
and remembering threatening experiences outside the programmed responses
of the first guards,
and planning for unexpected
ones to come,
it is they alone who crave and
consume resurrection stories.
But why?
Your muscles are not afraid of
death;
their molecules have an inherent
awareness of life’s endless cycles,
since they, (and atoms in the
non viable realm) are at its base,
and most of the brain’s cells
must have the same innate, silent awareness that within life, there can
be no -- non life;
but the minority area of the
brain that produces man’s
thought-based consciousness
acts for all the world as though
it is totally ignorant of what
the rest of his body so obviously knows:
life is alive,
and within life there is nothing
that does not live and persist,
be it atoms, molecules
-- even ideas.
The cells of your liver need
not fear for their future,
for even after your body as
a whole is laid in that eventual hole,
they are ‘aware’ -- or
at least they are not NOT aware that
they will survive and soon be
part of another mobile form,
but the cells that constitute
the areas of the brain responsible for
you having thoughts, memories
and plans all but -- cry out
in fear of extinction;
they plead for reassurance;
hence, the resurrection stories.
But curious comes this affair,
for where do the cells of consciousness
have to turn for such
comforting tales but to themselves:
none other in this universe
can compose such poetic tonics;
there is nothing in all of reality
to tell them that
everything will be all right
-- except themselves,
which, on the face of it, would
seem certainly, ‘not-to-do’ –
for if you are already burdened
with uncertainly,
how can you then reassure yourself?
How can a thing be frightened
and while in such a state,
via its own statements to itself,
vanquish the fear?
It all seems most strange --
even doubtful -- and yet it works,
and it works by man’s consciousness
creating a mythical history
outside of itself which it then
looks to as tangible evidence of its
intangible hopes ---
that of resurrection.
The neural cells that produce
thought within a man will cause him to consciously say that he is sure
he will not perish when he dies BECAUSE,
(and here he will figuratively,
verbally point to some extrinsic,
physically visible source: a
holy book,
the utterances of his group’s
founding hero, and say:)
‘Because so & so assured
us that it is so’ –
the assurance of resurrection
that they -- the man,
the molecules in his brain responsible
for him saying it embrace,
must be true, for did not he
who uttered, himself return from the dead.
‘The-proof-is-the-proof’
-- so say the cells that speak,
and since they alone do so --
who is to counter?
Why should anyone counter?
Of what benefit would it be
to an ordinary man & his mind-molecules
to dissuade them from this belief?
None.
Even though the first unit of
silent, instinctively responding guards are ultimately responsible for
the king’s physical survival,
in times of extreme stress the
second, vocal unit may try to verbally rally the first, exercising that
sensation of freedom,
and the ability to mentally
plan and foresee, unique to them,
in simple terms:
ordinary men who feel sad will
‘tell’ themselves to: ‘Cheer
up’ --
a most complex affair (on its
face):
the situation is like in a grandfather
clock that is winding down,
and causing the sound of the
hands’ movements to lag,
having the sluggish tick tocks
exhort the pendulum to: ‘Pick up the pace!
Tighten
up your act! Pull yourself together!
Look on the brighter, faster
side,’ and such.
Do you recognize the inherent,
inescapable tomglotzery?
…And yet, with ordinary men,
it is not total tomglotzery,
for rather than quickly sinking
in the swamp of
self-perpetuating dreams of
self-referential-impossibilities,
men’s minds latch to the external
myths that their predecessors
have already put in place,
and instead of trying to fool
themselves into a state of reassurance by telling themselves that things
are not as they know they are,
(which is plainly ridiculous),
they put such words in the mouth
of their founding hero,
(or a deity, which is an exaggeration
of the hero.)
Thus do men appear to accept
reassurance about matters which
bother them mentally, from sources
that are not themselves,
but which their own minds previously
created,
and now feign to have forgotten
doing.
A man actively trying to understand
what is going on --
and who has made some headway
–
has no where to turn for reassurance;
he recognizes the legitimacy
of what has above been limned;
he has a personal familiarity
with the desperation with which
his mind & thoughts live,
(compared to the rest of his being),
and he begins to suspect the
reason for their near frantic disquiet.
Ordinary men, in their mind,
dread physical death,
but in their mind, their mind
is disturbed even more by the prospect of their mental demise, that is:
men’s minds are deeply bothered
by trying to think about
their own non
existence;
not the death of the body, (which
is clearly beyond its ability to conceive),
but the extinction -- the
non existence of
the very thing that is attempting
to think about its non existence.
Thoughts, my boy, the thoughts
that life feeds to everyone through the species wide, collective neural
network,
it is the thoughts who tremble
& near disintegrate
when they try to handle the
idea of their own non existence.
It is man’s thoughts alone which
need and keep alive,
the resurrection stories, and
I will tell you, (best as words allow),
why, (or at least lay
a hint).
That which doubts its own existence,
most fears its extinction.
Strange, you might say: curious,
you might conclude,
but glance around you briefly
at others,
then look more deeply within
you -- at your own consciousness,
and it is easy to see that what
I describe, tracks things as they are.
But note what I earlier said:
a person privately struggling
to come to an understanding of life that is not normally served on mankind’s
routine menu
has no place to seek reassurance
about anything, save himself,
and, ‘himself’ (as he finds
it to natively be) is itself riddled-with, partially-composed-of,
uncertainties, questions & doubts,
which would seem to preclude
any success in this direction,
for from any ‘rational perspective’
(as defined by the collective
thought of mankind itself),
it is impossible for one who
does-not-know
to somehow teach himself
that which he does not know -- but -- AH!
-
there lurks a loose thread in
this otherwise tight weave;
in some people, for some reason,
there are free floating,
unaligned neurons in the brain
which somehow get around this
impossible situation of a blind
man teaching himself to see,
for did not this possibility
indeed exist --
how could I be describing it
to you,
and you realizing what I am
talking about.
Hormones and other guards silently
protect your earthly kingdom,my lad, while neurons cry out about potential
threats;
it all works nicely with the
majority,but the few feel out of step, as though something is not quite
right,
and the silent answer to the
question behind this feeling,
I have today mentioned
-- somewhere amidst the above words.
Freeing your ability to
actually -- Think --
from the natural dependence
your consciousness wants to have
on collective man’s automatic
thinking,
is the true resurrection;
a coming to life of that which was previously inert.”
Regarding
a certain matter, the king asked a courtier:
“What
do you think about it?” and he replied:
“The
same as you, Your Majesty” to which the king responded:
“But
you do not know what I think about it”
“It
does not matter Sire: whatever you think -- I think also.”
and
the jester, experienced well in the ways of the court, mused:
“Being
as there is no alternative -- why not say what he did?!
Why
not pretend that you do engage in willful and individual mental action
in
spite of the apparent evidence?
If
you accidentally trip, why not say: ‘I meant to do that’?!
It costs no more -- it indeed:
costs no more.”
The magnificent resurrection of efficiency.
As often as you can remember
to do so: stop and ask yourself:
what useful thing was your consciousness
doing
at the moment you stopped to
consider this question?
The death of useless concerns
-- the birth of fresh air.
J