February
3, 2001.
More
Tips For Solving The Case.
An investigator’s greatest tool
in dealing with the circumstances-of & participants-in the affair
is:
total insincerity.
(I remind you that all of this
information is being translated into english from a language that is
radically unrelated to any in use on this planet,
and that the word, “insincerity”
as employed herein
is not fully descriptive of the
reality it represents,
but is the closest available;
nonetheless, if you are truly
interested in
getting to the bottom of this
affair --
-- and you stay alert,
and cobra cold --
you will most likely get the
drift of what’s going on.)
The desire
of a person who thinks they want to
solve the case of being alive,
and
get the understanding,
must be innately sincere, or
their efforts are futile;
(nothing postnatally can affect
this;
you’re either born with red hair,
or you’re not.)
The desire to solve
the case IS
sincere,
but the investigator’s dealings
with the participants,
and circumstances of it is IN-sincere.
Anything less than this approach is
doomed.
The case revolves around the
investigator’s
gut feeling that --
“Things Are Not As They Seem”,
(more specifically):
“The Reality Of Life Does Not Jib With
Its Official Description.”
All men
vaguely feel this,
but it is left to the few professional
investigators,
born with a taste and flair for
such work,
to actively pursue the matter.
Civilians have so much other
business to see to
that they by and large simply
accept their questions regarding the maps of life being at variance
with
their own experience therewith,
and go on with their lives,
but their awareness of this dichotomy
does make
periodic public appearances as:
satire, and dramatic irony,
(the last word’s creation being
in fact,
entirely caused by the situation
stated.)
But other than for an occasional
nervous laugh,
ordinary men are driven by life
to constructively
overlook the fact that the descriptions
of life
that life makes come from their
brains and tongues
does not match the lives that
life forces them to live.
No -- only the “Professional
Investigator” is --
On The Case.
Okay,
here’s how things stand:
you, (the human, “P. I.”),
are looking into a matter, (life-as-lived-by-humans),
in which, (as noted above),
the participants, and potential
suspects, (humans),
feel from the outset that a crime
has been
perpetrated on them,
in that it is obvious that the
descriptions of life
that have been forced on them
-- with their
own minds being the helpless
medium therefor,
the entire crime scene
--
as an Investigator finds it when
he gets there --
is one of total hypocrisy, deceit,
and
free-standing insincerity.
Only an idiot takes holographic photos to
show around at a one-eyed-man’s convention,
or expects to hear german spoken at a
sons-of-napoli rally.
All
ordinary, normal, sane people feel,
(in their spare time),
that they are being conned;
that they are the victim of a
hoax;
that they are being played for
a fool,
so how can you, (the Professional
Investigator),
expect to get any straight answers
from them
regarding this gigantic con in
which they are
right-in-the-middle?! --
indeed
it is solely for them that the
con exists!
Ordinary civilians couldn’t give you impartial,
useful
information about this case even if they tried ‘til
their hemorrhoids exploded.
Only
-- “fake” -- (Ugh!)
-- investigators
waste their time in such dead
end activity;
you cannot get any help from
the victims of a crime
that occurs in a town named:
Crimeville,
and where all the citizens are
named:
Joe & Henrietta Victim;
you might as well ask a shark
to describe water.
No matter how “sincerely”
such people attempt
to answer your questions, and
aid in your investigation,
their “sincerity” means naught
--
’tis just a word men employ to
convey their desire to be factual and accurate regarding their
descriptions
of life as they know it to be
from experience,
in face of their known inability
to do so
by virtue of the fact that the
descriptions are not of their own design, but are forced
into their consciousness,
and then -- out of
their mouths by
the very thing they are
ostensibly trying to describe
--- life.
Under planet earth conditions,
the minds of men are incapable
of being sincere --
thus only a moron, (or ordinary
person),
attempts to be sincere with those
naturally incapable of being so, (due to prevailing conditions).
Would a gazelle waste valuable
time trying to
”sincerely” explain its
view of life
to a lion it had suddenly encountered?
Sincerity is meaningless in
matters of inevitability,
and nothing is more inevitable
than you being alive,
and your mind being naturally
subjected to
the voice in your head relentlessly
describing for you,
what “being
alive” is about.
Are you “sincere,” or not sincere
in your breathing?
The question is ridiculous, and
equally as silly is
asking other people --
and your own automatic mind -
to be sincere in their accounts
of the crime scene,
and the activities of any pertinent
participants.
But in this gigantic con, consider
this:
compared to the alternative, (which is
inconceivable),
-- ain’t
life something!
If you are ever going to solve-this-case,
and personally get-to-the-bottom-of-things,
you must employ appropriate measures
--
willful --
secret, and total -- insincerity.
…(what do you think was the inspiration
for the term, “fight fire with fire”?!)
J
…oh yeah, it case it didn’t
hit you plainly:
the biggest chump game is in
being sincere in
your reactions to what goes on
in your so-called,
”thinking” -- give
up that self-participatory con,
and you’ve damn near got the
case wrapped up.
|